Quote for the Day:

"Trust a person to that extent, that he feels guilty to cheat you and 
love a person to that extent, that he fears to lose you"

Important Case Law:

“Reassessment on audit objection invalid as all expense details were disclosed in original scrutiny: HC"

Where assessee disclosed all relevant agreements and expenses during original assessment and Assessing Officer had full material on record, reopening based solely on Audit Party objections regarding those same disclosed expenses, amounts to impermissible review/change of opinion on same material, which is impermissible, and thus resultant notice and order were liable to be set aside.

Where assessee had made return and disclosed all material facts for concluded assessment, notice issued under section 148 on 31-3-2023 was beyond four-year limitation under first proviso to section 149 as applicable, so extended six-year period did not apply, rendering such notice and subsequent proceedings invalid and liable to be quashed.

Case Analysis:   Sapphire Foods India Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (OSD)

Date:                 February 16, 2026

Citation:            [2026] 183 taxmann.com 506 (Delhi)

Facts of the Case:

• The assessee–company filed its return for assessment year 2016-17 on 8-10-2016 declaring a loss of about Rs. 10.24 crores.

• The case was selected for scrutiny and an assessment under section 143(3) was completed on 9-12-2018. During scrutiny, the Assessing Officer specifically called for details of salary/remuneration and legal/professional expenses, and the assessee furnished the Employment Agreement of its Managing Director and the Consulting Agreement of a shareholder, covering payments of Rs. 8.90 crores and Rs. 90.81 lakhs, respectively. The Assessing Officer thus had these documents, though no specific finding on these expenses was recorded in the assessment order.

• On 22-3-2023, the Assessing Officer issued a notice under section 148A(b) enclosing local Audit Party objections alleging escapement on account of (i) incorrect allowance of share premium of about Rs. 5.43 crores, and (ii) incorrect allowance of expenses aggregating about Rs. 9.81 crores (the above payments). The Assessing Officer invoked Explanation 1(ii) to section 148 and sought compliance by 29-3-2023. After considering the assessee’s reply, the Assessing Officer dropped the share premium objection but, relying on the expenses objection, passed an order under section 148A(d) and issued notice under section 148 on 31-3-2023.

• On writ before the High Court.

For Judgment,  Please click here

Useful Updates:

( Contribution by CA. Samarpit Sharma )

• The GST Insider 28th Edition [Budget Edition 2026]  Read More

( Contribution by CA. Rishabh Agarwal )

• 										The Weekly Global Tax & TP Brief | 9 Feb - 13 Feb 2026  Read More
  										

• Singapore Budget 2026 – Key Tax Highlights  Read More

• Saudi Arabia | New Economic Substance Requirements for Special Economic Zones (February 2026) Read More

• 										OECD releases Amount B Pricing FAQs and 2026 update of the Pricing Automation Tool Read More
  										

( Source: Taxmann.com )

• 										ICAI issues update on UDIN: New Reporting Requirements, Validation Measures and Tax Audit Limits  Read More
  										

Forthcoming CPE Programs in the North Region:

Find Your Next CPE Program with Ease!

Discover CPE programs near you in the North Region with Voice of CA's CPE Hours Program Ready Reckoner - your one-stop solution for professional development!

Click on below link for the Ready Reckoner:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1K3E-NfnSIl-UXEnZiIc4S1fzGPcpnG-a/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=118156324865208974839&rtpof=true&sd=true

Job Vacancies of the Week:

Click on the button below for this week's collated job vacancies.

You can always stay in touch with Voice of CA on various social media platforms. Click on the Linktree to reach out to us :