Thursday, November 5, 2009 |
1. C.I.T ALCATEL (Delhi High Court) Whether Assessee had business connection in India through its subsidiary?
2. METAPATH SOFTWARE INTNL LTD. (Delhi High Court) Whether Ld. ITAT in the facts and circumstances of the case erred in holding that such software supplies were sale and hence business income and not Royalty in terms of Indo-UK Treaty?
3. NOKIA CORPORATION (Delhi High Court) Whether on a true and correct/interpretation of Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the Tribunal was right in law in upholding assumption of jurisdiction under Section 154 of the Act by the Assessing Officer?
4. NOKIA NETWORKS OY (Delhi High Court) Whether on a true and correct interpretation of the relevant DTAA the Tribunal’s reasoning is right in law in holding that NDPL (the subsidiary of the Appellant) is its permanent establishment?
If you have any query please e-mail at voiceofca@gmail.com.
"Happiness is not a goal; it is a by-product"
Thanks for your valuable time
"Voice of CA" CA. Kapil Goel, Moderator-Direct Taxes, Mob:9910272806, cakapilgoel@gmail.com CA. Sidharth Jain, Co-Moderator, Mob: 9810418700, sidhjasso@yahoo.com CA. Mukesh K Bansal, Co-Moderator-FEMA, mkak@rediffmail.com |
« Back |