Monday, January 18, 2010 | ||||
1) Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta Vs ITAT –Delhi CIC- Right to Information Act-(Land Mark Decision) Whether the Act is intended to cover a judicial proceeding conducted by a court of law or by a tribunal or an authority exercising statutory powers in a quasi judicial manner. Held that the appellant cannot take recourse to the RTI Act to challenge a judicial decision regarding disclosure of a given set of information, which properly belonged to the jurisdiction of that judicial authority. If the appellant is aggrieved with the decision of the ITAT, the remedy lies elsewhere.
2) CIT Vs M/s Premium Taxcons Pvt. Ltd.- Uttarakhand high Court- Section 115JA
It has been held that “we are satisfied that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was fully justified, in not accepting the plea of the Revenue, to include the income received by the assessee, which had earlier been written off as a bad debt, as a part of the “book profit”
If you have any query please e-mail at voiceofca@gmail.com
"Always keep the company of good persons. Who themselves are good, only they, can show the right path."
Thanks for your valuable time
"Voice of CA"
CA. Sidharth Jain, Co-Moderator, sidhjasso@yahoo.com CA. Mukesh K Bansal, Co-Moderator-FEMA, mkak@rediffmail.com
|
||||
« Back | ||||