Connect us       New User?     Subscribe Now
Confirm your Email ID for Updates
27-04-2010 - Recent Updates as on 27.04.10 & A Useful Article on GST
Tuesday, April 27, 2010

 

1)    CIT vs ACC Rio Tinto Exploration Ltd.- Tinto Section 35E Mineral Exploration Etc: Held: 

“Going through the objects of the assessee company and the permission granted by the FIPB, the Tribunal, in our view rightly so, came to the conclusion that the assessee was not in the business of mining ores or mineral and that it was only in the business of prospecting or exploring the ores and minerals. Consequently, the argument of the Assessing Officer, that the assessee had not commenced its business, was held to be incorrect. We agree with this conclusion, which is based purely on the facts of the present case … 9. In the present case, the Tribunal has, on facts, come to the conclusion that the assessee company‘s objects did not include mining of ores or minerals or commercial production, in the sense understood within the meaning of Section 35 E of the said Act. Consequently, the Tribunal agreed with the assessee‘s contention that there would never be commercial production of any mineral or ore as a part of the activities of the assessee in view of the very objects of the assessee company and the FIPB permission given to the assessee company. Consequently, the provisions of Section 35 E would not be applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case as there was no possibility of any commercial production. We agree with this reasoning.”

(Click here for judgment) 

  

2)        CIT vs Anil Bhalla - DHC: Host of Issues on Search Assessment (refer Order enclosed) P&h High Court on Addition on basis of Valuation report: Up Held:

”It was also found that the revenue did not bring anything on record suggesting that expenses incurred were more than the one declared and the Valuation report alone cannot constitute basis for making additions.”

(Click here for judgment)  

   

[Contribution by  CA. Rajat Mohan, author is available on Mobile No.  9910044223 / email-id: rajat.mohan@icai.org ]

3)   GST : Understanding Department of revenue reply: This article would analyze the DOR reply in detail.

[Click here for Article]

  

What's New 

a.  Perquisite value of free - concessional educational facilities  (Click for detail)

b.   New Saral II Notified (Click for detail)

c.   States threaten to spoil GST party by hiking VAT  (Click for detail)

d.   Gratuity amendment Bill tabled in Lok Sabha  (Click for detail)

   

(Click here) for Team Voice of CA Chapters detail.

   

"Opportunities are never lost; someone will take the one you miss"

        

Thanks for your valuable time

"Voice of CA"

CA. Sanjay Kumar Agarwal, Founder - Voice of CA 

Member  Central Council - ICAI 

(Former Chairman - NIRC)

Mob : 9811080342, agarwal.s.ca@gmail.com

      

CA. Kapil Goel, Moderator-Direct Taxes, Mob:9910272806, cakapilgoel@gmail.com

CA. Sidharth Jain, Co-Moderator, sidhjasso@yahoo.com

CA. Mukesh K Bansal, Co-Moderator-FEMA, Mob:9540022533,mukbansal80@gmail.com

 

« Back
 
Online Poll
Connect Us       New User?     Subscribe Now