Connect us       New User?     Subscribe Now
Confirm your Email ID for Updates
29/04/2009 - Section 57 of Uttaranchal Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Uttranchal HC in M/s. I.A.S Products , opines that
Wednesday, April 29, 2009

1.      Uttranchal HC in M/s. I.A.S Products , opines that "Pressure Regulator" cannot be said to be a container by interpreting it to be part and parcel of the "Cylinder".

      (Click here for Analysis)

      (Click here for Judgment) 

 

2.      P&HHC in M/s. Girnar Impex Ltd. : held that limitation plea being mixed question of fact and law cannot be taken for first time before High Court.

      (Click here for Analysis)

      (Click here for Judgment) 

 

3.      P&HHC in Sachdeva & Sons: has very beautifully ruled that whether it is the State or the individual, unless explanation is offered for the delay that it is either reasonable or satisfactory to the satisfaction of the court, delay cannot be condoned.

      (Click here for Analysis)

      (Click here for Judgment) 

 

4.      P&HHC in Deepak Radio : in context of permissible stage/authority for admission of statutory forms enabling assessee to claim concessional taxation.

      (Click here for Analysis)

      (Click here for Judgment) 

 

Thanks for your valuable time

 

"Voice of CA"

 

CA. Kapil Goel, Moderator-Direct Taxes, Mob: 9910272806, cakapilgoel@gmail.com

CA. Sidharth Jain, Co-Moderator, Mob: 9810418700, sidhjasso@yahoo.com

CA. Mukesh K Bansal, Co-Moderator-FEMA, mkak@rediffmail.com

(click here) for the Membership Form for becoming the Associate Member of ‘Voice of CA’.

 

 

If you have knowledge, let others light their candles at it

 

 

« Back
 
Online Poll
Connect Us       New User?     Subscribe Now