Connect us       New User?     Subscribe Now
Confirm your Email ID for Updates
27.05.2011 - Recent Updates as on 27.05.2011
Saturday, May 28, 2011

 

1.   [Contribution by P.C.Yadav, Advocate - Supreme Court of India]

I.  ITO Vs. M/s Kailashpati Overseas Pvt. Ltd. ITA No. 4268 / Del / 2009, Assessment Year 2001 – 2002, ITAT – Delhi

Whether when assessee submits the relevant details in respect of share application money such as PAN Number, confirmation and the bank particulars it can be said that the assessee has discharged its burden and no addition can be made on the basis of investigation averments, and it is incumbent on the AO to prove that averments of investigation wing applies in the case of the assessee-Held-Yes.

In this case the assessee has received share application money from some persons- On the basis of investigation wing report AO reopened the assessment of the impugned years and direct the assessee to produce the share applicants- Assessee could not produce any body- AO made the addition- CIT(A) allowed the appeal of the assessee- Matter reached to the ITAT wherein the AR of the assessee points out that assessee has discharged its initial burden and the ball is in the court of AO to investigate further AR of the assessee relied on the decision of Oasis Hospitality- ITAT dismissed the appeal of the department.

(Please click here for judgment)

  

II.  Dish India Micro credit Vs. CIT, 1374/ Del /2010, ITAT – Delhi

Assessee a Company constituted under section 25 of the Companies Act and engaged in micro-financing activities means providing loans to the poor community of the society as per the guide lines of the RBI- It applies for registration of 12AA in the prescribed form - CIT referring to the incidental objects of the Company as prescribed in Memorandum of Association of the Company held that the activities of the Company are not charitable- On appeal before the ITAT, the AR of the assessee argued that the CIT has completely over looked the main objects, dissolution clause and restriction of RBI imposed on assessee, and has rejected the application of the assessee in a summary manner- Before ITAT AR of the assessee argued that at the stage of granting 12AA only prima facie conditions are to be looked into-ITAT decided the case in the favour of assessee.

(Please click here for judgment)

  

2.   [Contribution by  CA. Manoj Gupta, and contributor is available on Mobile No. 9350760606 / email-id: mgupta2803@gmail.com ]

A Useful Article on “ MAI Scheme by Ministry of Commerce and Industry”

(Please click here for article)

  

 

What's New

  1. CBDT INSTRUCTION NO. 7/2011 - Standard operating Procedure on Filing of Appeals to High Court  (Click for detail)

  2. STAX CIR-143-11-Processing for or on behalf of client, in relation to agriculture – causing sale or purchase of agricultural produce  (Click for detail)

  3. Co. Law Notification amending Form No. 23D related to information by cost auditor to Central Government  (Click for detail)
     

 

"If we succeed in tricking someone, never think he is a fool, it is because he trusted us much more than we deserved"

  

Thanks for your valuable time

   

"Voice of CA"

  
CA. Sanjay Kumar Agarwal, Founder - Voice of CA
Member  Central Council - ICAI
Former Chairman - NIRC
Mob : 9811080342,
agarwal.s.ca@gmail.com 
   
   
CA. Sidharth Jain, Co-Moderator
sidhjasso@yahoo.com 
  
CA. Mukesh K Bansal, Co-Moderator-FEMA
Mob:9540022533,
mukbansal80@gmail.com    
 

« Back
 
Online Poll
Connect Us       New User?     Subscribe Now