-
Due Date for submission of refund application in form 501 for the year 2009-10 has been extended up-to 31st December 2011 (Click for detail)
-
SC-Altered Will Must be Signed by Testator (Click for detail)
-
Not. No. 17 - Withdrawal of Draft of Companies (Dematerialization of Certificates) Rules, 2011 (Click for detail)
-
Microfinance Bill likely in Winter Session (Click for detail)
- Disclose audit reports of cooperative banks: CIC to RBI (Click for detail)
II. Recent Updates:
1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs. M/S. S. K. TEKRIWAL, I.T.A NO. 1135/KOL/2010, ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007-08, DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 21.10.2011, ITAT – KOLKATA
S. 40(a)(ia) provides for a disallowance if amounts towards rent etc have been paid without deducting tax at source. It does not apply to a case of short-deduction of tax at source. As the assessee had deducted u/s 194C, it was not a case of “non-deduction” of TDS. If there is a shortfall due to difference of opinion as to which TDS provision would apply, the assessee may be treated as a defaulter u/s 201 but no disallowance can be made u/s 40(a) (ia).
(Please click here for judgment)
2. MR. FAISAL ABBAS Vs. DY. COMMR.OF INCOME-TAX, I.T.A.NOS. 3485 & 3487/MUM/2010, A.YS. 2002-03 & 2007-08, DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 25.10.2011, ITAT- MUMBAI
In our considered opinion, the authorities below were not justified in not granting the set off of the brought forward business loss for the reason that the requirement to file return within the time prescribed u/s.139(1) is for carrying forward the loss. Once loss is determined in the return file u/s.139(3), the assessee becomes eligible for set off against the income of the subsequent years irrespective of the fact whether the returns of such later years are filed u/s.139(1) or not. Sec. 80 read with sec. 139(3) requires the submission of return for loss before the due date. There is no such requirement that the subsequent years, in which the set off is claimed, must also fulfill the requirement of furnishing the returns within the time required u/s.139(1).
It is further important to note that sec. 153A dealing with assessment in case of search provides for the issuance of notice to the assessee in respect of each assessment year falling within six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted. Sec. 153A(1)(a) clearly provides that “the provisions of this Act shall, so far as may be, apply accordingly as if such return were a return required to be furnished under section 139”. From the prescription of sec. 153A, it is apparent that the return filed in response to notice u/s.153A is treated as the return filed u/s.139. If that is the position, we are unable to appreciate as to how the loss determined for the immediately preceding year will not be available to the assessee for the set off against the current year’s income declared in the return filed u/s.153A. The position is quite different in the case of assessment u/s.153A. Under the substituted mode of assessment pursuant to search, the requirement is to assess or re-assess the “total income” in respect of each assessment year falling within such six assessment years as contrary to the determination of “undisclosed income” u/s.158BC for the block period. There is no provision analogous to sec. 158BB (4) in section 153A etc.
(Please click here for judgment)
III. Today's Bottomline News :
New User? 
Subscribe Now