Connect us       New User?     Subscribe Now
Confirm your Email ID for Updates
27.07.2013 - Voice of CA Presents - Updates
Saturday, July 27, 2013

 I.  Today's Headlines   


  1. Cir. No. 8: Filing of online DVAT-48 returns for the First Quarter of 2013-14  (Click for detail)   
  2. DVAT Noti.: Submission of Form DP-1 - Form DP-1 shall be submitted online latest by 26.08.2013  (Click for detail)
  3. Cir. VAT Audit: Regarding Audit of Dealers  (Click for detail) 
  4. RBI: Accept EMI Cheques only where ECS not Available  (Click for detail)

 

II.  Direct Tax Case laws:

 
1.  Krishak Bharti Cooperative Limited Vs. DCIT, ITA No. 1248/2010, Date of Judgment: 24.07.2013, Delhi High Court

Decision : In favor of assessee.
Section : 80I of the I.T. Act, 1961

Whether the ownership is necessary for consideration of service charges as profits and gains from industrial undertaking?

Held : No

The service charges received on account of operating and maintenance of another industrial undertaking which is an extension of the assessee industrial undertaking shall be considered as profits and gains derived from industrial undertaking. Section 80I, nowhere requires the ownership of undertaking for being eligible for said deduction. The Hon’ble High Court, on consideration of the facts, interpretation, and legislative intention of law, decided in favor of assessee.

Since there Is a direct nexus between the service charges and the industrial undertaking, these can be said to be derived from the industrial undertaking and accordingly, shall be considered as profits and gains from industrial undertaking.

(Please click here for judgment)


2.  M/s Pepsico India Holdings Private Limited Vs. DCIT Circle - 14(1), ITA No. 147/Del/2010, Date of Decision: 05-07-2013, ITAT - Delhi

Whether the disallowance on account of bad debt and advances written off is justifiable in law?

In the present case the AO disallowed the assessee claim on account of bad debt and advances written off. AO held that the bad debt and advances written off were of capital in nature and hence disallowed and added to the income of the assessee. To this the assessee appealed before the CIT (A). The CIT (A) deleted the disallowance with regard to bad debt and upheld the AO decision with respect to interest accrued on loan on the grounds that it does not qualify for bad debt u/s 36(1) (vii). Section 36(1) (Vii) requires that the debt must be incidental to the business of the assessee and since the assessee was engaged in the manufacture and sale of soft drink so the same is not allowable.

On appeal before the ITAT, the ITAT perused the Form 3-CD and observed that providing loan to     companies involved in the business of manufacture of soft drink beverage is within the object of     the company. The ITAT held its decision in the favour of assessee and allowed the assessee claim     with respect to advances written off as revenue in nature.

(Please click here for judgment)

 

 Golden Rules:

"When GOD solves our problems,
We have faith in HIS abilities;
when GOD doesn't solve our problems,
He has faith in our abilities
"

 

  Thanks & Regards

Team

Voice of CA

 

 


 

« Back
 
Online Poll
Connect Us       New User?     Subscribe Now